Chapter 8. The arms race. Free will or determinism? |
Chapter VIII. The arms race: determinism or free will? 1.Five social determinisms.
2. The distribution of wealth and power or the determinism of injustice. 3. The relatively equal distribution of IQ 4. The trouble of EM vs IQ or of B1+2 vs B3. Libraries have been written on this subject. Not to drown in it, I will simply concentrate on what I consider to be the most important elements in the present world, long-term integration, short-term disintegration, relative inequality in power and wealth, relative equality in intelligence, and the resulting conflicts. How you, as the alfa-animal, can keep power over a herd that is thousands or even a few million times greater then that of the six million year old kinship herd, which still is our biologically given mental reality, is the power problem in an integrating world. This is a contradiction that may well explain the contradiction between the long-term tendency to integration and the short-term disturbances of dis-integration. 3. The relatively equal distribution of intelligence. This problem is yet more complicated by the distribution of the human intelligence which is, and always will remain, different from that of power. The distribution of IQ in a given society can be seen as two combined triangles. An upper one with half of the population that tests above 100 and a lower one with the other half that tests below 100. If you put that IQ-distribution on top of the distribution of power, you get a picture that looks somewhat like the one below. This is, if you so wish, a "pedagogical" picture. In reality the intelligence at the top may go up to around 200, and at the bottom it may disappear almost completely in children born as "anencepahlic", without almost any brain whatsoever. There is a small but rather stable co-variation between IQ and income leading to wealth. Thus the distribution of economic power will tend to follow that of political power. In spite of this, however, inside any given society the distribution of power and wealth is bound to be infinitely more unequal than the distribution of man's master tool. This difficulty can be seen when the two figures are united: 8. The trouble of emotions versus intelligence or of B1+2 versus B3. As a little contemplation makes quite clear, there is a very great number of individuals who in the power pyramid are pressed down far below their intelligence level. Which is bound to make some of the question their place in society and also the "justice" of its distribution. Would we draw the power pyramid in a more realistic manner, with a very thin top and an even broader base, then the difference in the distribution of power and wealth on the one hand and intelligence on the other would be even more visible. From this follows that even a majority of population may well have more intelligence than they have influence in society. The more unequal the distribution of wealth and power becomes, the stronger will be the tendencies of the intelligent to dream of equality and to question the wisdom of the few rulers and their gangs of opportunistic career slaves. For two reasons, this is a sinister problem for the present world. First because integration towards globalization by necessity leads to bigger absolute gaps in both wealth and power; and second, because the greed in our present Western society - as well as in those like Russia and China who copy our capitalist "free" market system - is such that it tends to change our democracies into plutocracies. These, I will maintain, are the deterministic tendencies that may lead us in the direction of annihilation, unless we finally use our intelligence to master our behaviour. |